FAQ
It is currently Fri Jul 21, 2017 10:51 pm


Author Message
Arcades
Post  Post subject: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:37 am

Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 2

Offline
A FOUNDATIONAL POSTULATION OF ABSOLUTE COSMOLOGICAL SYNERGY
BY: Arcades

If matter and space and energy were indeed released from a point of infinite energetic density then structurally these facets must share a unitary, absolute developmental capacity ,especially since the point of infinite energetic density is postulated to have been of zero size.

The ultramicroscopic level of so-called spacetime is postulated in traditional physics to be of size,but it is necessary to clarify this for the neophysics postulatory. The ultramicroscopic level affixed within contemporary definitive parameters is seen categorically as being of a scale of size relative to larger scales of spacetime that are observably characterized by so-called space , matter , energy, in time and absolute material causality,factors that do not apply with the exact fluency in the ultramicroscopic level that is observed in larger scales of spacetime ;denotatively put:the absolute cohesion of the material factors that is essential to the definition of the quintessence of the observational context and the context of that which is said observable(matter,time,space, energy-reality as a whole,therefore temporal size valuation) does not consist at the ultramicroscopic level,therefore to say that the ultrtamicroscopic level is a level of size is not a categorical analysis,and this analysis thus demands illucidation,that would have clarified the contradiction between quantum mechanics and gravity ,in league with the neophysic postulatory, as compromised temporal platforms rather than temporal operational invariability.As the gradual breakdown of levels of spacetime occurs the absolutely cohesive synopsis of spacetime as lower levels of size are observed has to be correlated appropriately to the material basis and the equipment of observation.

Rather than being a blockade of our possible fluent synopsis of a so-called physical reality, the ultramicroscopic level represents the rudimentary and thus the only consisting state of any determinable physical reality, a physical reality from which space, energy,and matter(bosons are categorized as matter) are developmentally conjunctive aspects,but not in terms of growth upon, but of indostructural organization,as is indicated by several clear levels of spacetime displaying departures from the structure apparent at the largest scale but still all levels appear to cohesively comprise a single physical reality where such strict operationality as a causality principle can fare without any determinable distortions to the fabric of physical reality.As the gradual breakdown of levels of spacetime occurs the absolutely cohesive synopsis of spacetime as lower levels of size are observed has to be correlated appropriately to the material basis and the equipment of observation.

Given the gradual indefining of the largest scale's physical and temporal ukase , the consistency that is analysed as a said physical reality is more like a synergy rather than an inexplicably contradicting construct--what would be the context or premise for such departures being in themselves independently exacting coherentizing aspectives so as to be categorizable as a complete visceralization comparativable with other such aspectives .logically speaking,the point of infinite energetic density must have required,for its release and state, enaction to internal factors from internal consistence . this reasoning is what led to innumerable augmentative, modificatory postulations to the big bang theory,most appertaining to this present postulation is the big crunch theory , and some other pre- big bang theoretics did arise desperate to solve the beginning contradiction to causality where the point is said to have originated itself,or its presentation really is connotated as an inexplicable physical imposition of absolute authority for there can be no material explanation put forth to address the something out of nothing impasse that does not contraindict the principles of causality upon which the synopsis of physical reality depends essentially.

None of these theoretic attempts have put into use the non sequitur between the state of ultramicroscopic level of so-called spacetime and the level of spacetime that is said to fease the material proposition and result of observation and experiment .The point of infinite energetic density did release space,matter,and energy. that is a part of the postulation here ,reconfigure to exceed the traditional causality limitation and therefore the accompanying material consequences and subsequences such as the quality of space being absolutely entwined with time ,allowing an avenue out of the' something out of nothing' dilemma where this something receives a redefinition that frees it from such an ardent stance opposite to so-called nothingness.

Given that the ultramicroscopic level unravels time,space,material,energetic perceptions any preceeding state to the big bang,the preceeding state to the compacting and the compaction of such a point critically could have only been initiated within the scope of possibility that is observed as being the effecting modus operandi of the ultramicroscopic level--the topsy-turvy interpretation of that which is termed as space foam. therefore ,it is that the release of spacetime and matter and energy was the release of an explication to the founding of what is now rudimentarion substancia premissary: experiencable,observable, physical existence ,as continuing developmentority, a consisting modus of a dynamicer parameter ,of which the literal and colliteral circumferences of physical existence:space are unified as a natural aspectivity,a subtextivity;therefore the facets of physical existence: space,matter,time,energy are of a preterite basality that can be expressed as the state of the point of infinite energetic density at critical compaction and its ' encapsulate dynamicer parameter' which assesses the point the capacity of supraliterate proximal relativity ; given the resulting circumstantially noncommutable aspectivity of physical reality that cohered post the supra-literal state expressed above, the point of infinite energetic density cannot be stated with absolute categoricality to have been within an encapsulation, nor be applicable per any known proximal relativity : most significantly time must now be analysed as an extrinsic ,as progressively as the ultramicroscopic level is conveying consistently. In regard to the releasing itself the idea of release here seems postdictive.What here is materialent as a realistic mechanistic is requiring appropriater analysis.Observation remains in the operation of this developmentarity within a material complex similar to the uncertainty principle,where a physical reality is indelibly type-literal consequent to observations operational structural inclusion,therefore the fact of the incongruity on both sides of the incongruitas.

The ultramicroscopic sphere is not actually incongruous but rather congruous,seamlessly ,for its presence is naturally seen as incongruous in observation as exceeding the natural parameters of observational ukase that evaluates as if the largest scale almost completely, specifically the foundation of time and space in their most invariable definitive case , is an axis level rather than a part of a synergistic system,in clear disregard of the absolute coherency of systemum subjectionacy in all physical reality,which must denote a system likeness to any dynamicer parameter that is put forth to circumvent the" something out of nothing " non sequitur and to maintain the construct of causality without having to subconsciously or consciously" square peg" the beginning manifestSpace and time are quintessential to the temporality's perceptical physical existencia(physical reality),and the ultramicroscopic sphere's effect invariably underscores the physical consistency of the temporality- with or without the context of a consisting synergism.And also in a purely material context where the incongruitas itself reveals space and time as type-literate in an ultimate sense for the principles of systematics are impartial throughout so-called physical reality. Temporality's inclusion has to equal an impinged visceralization of self consistency and the consistency of a coherency of relatival proximality and the consistency of these consequently subjectivent proximals.
In this analysis the ultramicroscopic sphere is never subsequent nor consequent nor sequent in time and space to observation.

The postulation is not expounding spacetime unfolding, and thereafter matter and energy,nor the reverses ,but that developmental basis is actual and therefore must be conclusively physically demonstrable .
Spin valuation is here being proposed as signification of developmental departure, therefore rather than being an intermittent or a selective characteristic it is an intrinsic characteristic of all elementary particles. Spin represents intrinsic angular momentum inseperable from a particle's energetic state, parameters that scope a particle's potential for energetic and spatial interaction. We must remember that there is only a temporal basis for that which is termed as perception and thus the perception of a physical reality functioning with operational descriptivity: the conservation laws, the causality principles ,which invariably would have to seem immodifiably fundamental for the temporality is seen as materially founded absolutely, therefore subjected to the systematic principle of inclusion.

The intrinsicness of spin itself is absolutely necessary for a real manifestation in existence to be categorizable as an elementary particle-it "is" the particle,thus energy ,synonymous with the spin of elementary particles and cumulatively in larger particles like protons and neutrons and the atom,is the motion stipulator,where isospin is said to be the description of motivity that is similar to dimensional spin rather than dimensional ,where dimensionality can only be temporally prefaced as a given context internal to a said physical reality,and supra-literal proximal relativity exceeds precisely,circumscribing basal inclusional systematic perspectivity of the temporal materiality.

There is not a particle in existence that is an objective intent in itself;there is no logical premise for an intent,nor any material premise for the internal compartmentalization of consisting structure as seen in the intra-symmetricity encapsulate in the temporally quasi-comparative statedom that is elementarism to developmentarism( the physical demonstration of the existencive context of size) that is not available in open space,open space that can only be sized in distance that can only be referenced from our material perspective that interfaces differently with space from how we materially interrelate with other material objects,therefore the developmentality of mass is quite dissimilar from that of so-called space.Mass constructs or deconstructs from energetic potential and space facilitates the coherence and the determinable operation,which denotes clear systematic adherence, where energy is the manifest limit to that which is termed as matter, and therefore the temporally determined intrinsicity of spin and thus spins inextricable synonymity with the manifest effect of matter are accurately assessable to the systematic inclusionness of temporality, and given that the temporality shows itself as being comprised of elementary particles again confirms the certainty of a dynamicer parameter than the immediately temporally available material context .But this should be more than precisely stated ,and should proceed to physical demonstration. and even more importantly for this postulation,there is o material premise for the incompartmentalization of a perceiveably consisting structure given that causality has no actual physical representation in reality.

The coherence of causality is the operation of that which is already material in time,correlative with the "square peg" manifest ,that is incapable of assessing causality anymore than a dependent physicalization.
to state that there is not a particle in existence that is of objective intent is to propose that mass itself is not a goal reached but the appearance of an ongoing process- likeness, and so is space, and so is energy, that is conveyable to us as a synergism- likeness for the systematic inclusion of the temporality,where elementary isospin can only be similar to socalled dimension as seeable by the temporality, that is itself a determinable system comprised of multiple elementary particles rather than a single elementary particle. Therefore spin must appear nondimensional where the cumulative effect of multiple elementary particles conveys three dimensional reality.this is why isospin was forced to be discovered for the electron was displaying behaviours that inherently upended the conservation laws .

Instead of saying that the elementary particle had dimension ,which would have negated the criterion of the standard model(this was a brilliant call in my estimation), the electron was assessed dimension-likeness,that was made inseperable from the manifest state of the elementary particle ,which dictates a consisting persistent activity that exceeds the capacity of dimensionality ,which is a warp provided by the multiplicity of elementary particles in system.The singular behavour of a singular elementary particle was destined to reveal itself as contradictory to dimensionality. This spin likeness that is quintessential to the material manifest shows itself as complicit in operation ,or conduct of a said physical reality,to space and to energy,which indicates a matteral type literal take on the effectivity of the causality rescuing dynamicer parameter, where three dimensional motivity is not the face of absolute existecive platform,but underscored by a supra-relative basality . At the compaction of the point of infinite energetic density it was supra-literately relative to the dynamicer parameter.

The point compacted, therefore had to have possessed ,as a now physical point per se, a correspondent form of spin,representing the nature of angular momentum..............................(thank you for reading through this friends. it only gets clearer and clearer as the work goes on).


Top
marnixR
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 4:28 pm
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:35 pm
Posts: 4798
Location: Cardiff, Wales

Offline
"A FOUNDATIONAL POSTULATION OF ABSOLUTE COSMOLOGICAL SYNERGY" ?

before i read your very lengthy post, can you explain what, in the context of your post, do the words "foundational", "postulation", "absolute", "cosmological" and "synergy" mean ?

just to make sure that we're on the same wavelength (insofar as that is possible)

_________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." (Philip K. Dick)
"Someone is WRONG on the internet" (xkcd)


Top
GiantEvil
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 5:10 pm
User avatar
Original Member
Original Member

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 786

Offline
The OP is simply a flaming pile of trash, not even worthy of pseudoscience. This joker has posted the exact same incomprehensible wall of random text at numerous science forums. I guess the good news is that their search engine found our forum, we must be going up in the rankings. But there is still zero content to the OP. The random Deepak Chopra quote generator is far more cogent than the OP. This guy makes far less sense than Futilitist. Any responses will involve only hand wavy crankiness. I very seriously doubt that the OP has any clear idea of just what the words they use means. What is the phrase I am looking for? Oh yea, not even wrong! And also, word salad!

_________________
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.
-W. K. Clifford-


Top
Arcades
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 6:02 pm

Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 9:25 am
Posts: 2

Offline
GiantEvil wrote:
The OP is simply a flaming pile of trash, not even worthy of pseudoscience. This joker has posted the exact same incomprehensible wall of random text at numerous science forums. I guess the good news is that their search engine found our forum, we must be going up in the rankings. But there is still zero content to the OP. The random Deepak Chopra quote generator is far more cogent than the OP. This guy makes far less sense than Futilitist. Any responses will involve only hand wavy crankiness. I very seriously doubt that the OP has any clear idea of just what the words they use means. What is the phrase I am looking for? Oh yea, not even wrong! And also, word salad!

what a word salady way of saying good morning arcades where is the rest of it then. Friday my friend. im all lambasted and derided out , I need to jog down to the beach and get a swim,jamaica is the place for that.ill post the next bit of socalled tosh on Friday.
marnixR wrote:
"A FOUNDATIONAL POSTULATION OF ABSOLUTE COSMOLOGICAL SYNERGY" ?

before i read you very lengthy post, can you explain what, in the context of your post, do the words "foundational", "postulation", "absolute", "cosmological" and "synergy" mean ?

just to make sure that we're on the same wavelength (insofar as that is possible)
thank you for question which counts as high levity in the present atmosphere. Put together: I am laying down firstly a slate of connected postulations that will complexify as the work progresses ,where the basics that are stated in this first section will remain axial to the reading, become so more and more as the reading progresses Specifically "absolute cosmological synergy" stands as the epicenter phrase, ultimately entering the crux focus :physical reality is as we have never thought it ,where matter and space and energy together remain in an absolute balance that superfices the viscerality that we say now is a physical reality itself ,therefore we possess no capacity to figure out the premise for an observably active reality as opposed to an inactive reality ,opposed to the whole context of viscerality being, and being characterized by what is said to be determinable operancy: the big bang started,then exploded,then matter, then complex construction of matter to specificity(the atom), an intent and specified precision that we presently cannot even begin to explain the premise for. we basically just say that this is the way and proceed at the moment. I hope that helped.


Top
iNow
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:12 pm
User avatar
Original Member
Original Member

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 11:40 pm
Posts: 5601
Location: Iowa

Offline
moved to pseudoscience

_________________
iNow

"[Time] is one of those concepts that is profoundly resistant to a simple definition." ~C. Sagan


Top
marnixR
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:28 pm
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 04, 2011 8:35 pm
Posts: 4798
Location: Cardiff, Wales

Offline
Arcades wrote:
I hope that helped.


i'm afraid not - you appear to be using neologisms for the hell of it without any real need + leave yourself wide open to the accusation of word salad

why for instance not use the slightly longer phrase "will become more complex" rather the pretentious-sounding "will complexify"
and what do "will remain axial to the reading", "that superfices the viscerality" and "determinable operancy" mean ? plain english might have used more words but would have enhanced the chance that the real meaning of what you're trying to say is getting through to your intended audience

more suspicious minds than mine might interpret your style as an attempt to confuse rather than to enlighten

_________________
"Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." (Philip K. Dick)
"Someone is WRONG on the internet" (xkcd)


Top
GiantEvil
Post  Post subject: Re: Neophysics  |  Posted: Thu Sep 12, 2013 8:38 pm
User avatar
Original Member
Original Member

Joined: Sat Aug 06, 2011 10:19 am
Posts: 786

Offline
arcades wrote:
what a word salady way of saying good morning arcades where is the rest of it then. Friday my friend. im all lambasted and derided out , I need to jog down to the beach and get a swim,jamaica is the place for that.ill post the next bit of socalled tosh on Friday.

Ah see, now I actually understood that sentence. Good job!

_________________
It is wrong always, everywhere, and for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence.
-W. K. Clifford-


Top
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Print view

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
Jump to:   
cron

Delete all board cookies | The team | All times are UTC


This free forum is proudly hosted by ProphpBB | phpBB software | Report Abuse | Privacy